Mr. Darcy Broke My Heart by Beth Pattillo

Review by Mirah W. (mwelday)

I decided to take a different approach with this review.  A lot of books now have readers’ group guides included but most of the time I’m not reading with a book group.  So for this blog post I decided to answer some questions in the readers’ guide.  If you’ve read Mr. Darcy Broke My Heart and have a different opinion on how to answer these, please share your thoughts! I’d love to have a dialogue with you about this novel or Jane Austen’s original novels.

1-      Claire Prescott realizes that she has put her sister first in everything because she has been afraid to live her own life.  At what point does sacrifice for the people we love become more hurtful than helpful? How do we know when we have crossed that line? How can we restore those relationships to a healthier balance?

This is a tough one for me.  Sometimes in my life I think because I love someone it might not really be a sacrifice to give up something for him/her.  But I suppose once someone becomes aware he/she is not living a happy, true, fulfilling life and it is because of sacrificing for someone else, then things have crossed a line.  The glitch is how someone could actually realize and accept that this has happened.  People often don’t want to listen when things are difficult to hear.  It can take a big event happening to be willing to listen to another person’s opinion.  It’s hard to say ‘no’ but sometimes that is what it really takes to regain control and restore a healthy balance to a relationship.

2-      The plot of the novel revolves around the keeping of secrets. How do you know when to keep a secret and when to share it? What are the risks of keeping secrets?  What are the benefits?

I think it’s ok to keep secrets if no one is going to be hurt because of the secret.  It can be a lot of pressure on a relationship to keep some secrets but in being able to do so a relationship can be strengthened.

3-      When she arrives in Oxford, Claire decides to recreate herself. To do so, she must deceive the people she meets.  Do you think it’s understandable that she would fall prey to this temptation? What price does she pay for her duplicity?

Yes, it’s understandable that Claire wants a chance to be someone new.  She has come to the realization she is not living her life the way she truly wants.  She sees an opportunity to not hurt others in her deception because she doesn’t plan on developing any long-term relationships with the people she encounters in Oxford.  However, this plan backfires when new relationships are forged.

4-      In the end, do you think Claire gave Harriet the right advice about what to do with the manuscript? Why or why not? If you had been in Harriet’s place, what decision would you have made?

I don’t think I would have made the same decision as Claire.  But I don’t want to say what my decision would have been because I don’t want to give away the ending for those who haven’t read the book yet!

5-      In recent years, Mr. Darcy has truly become an iconic romantic hero. Do you think he is a true hero? Why or why not? If you had been Claire, would you have chosen James or Neil? In your estimation, what makes a man a hero?

In my opinion, Mr. Darcy is a hero.  He can admit his own mistakes and wants to be a protector.  I think true heroes have flaws and find ways to get past them.  And in Pride and Prejudice he did sweep Elizabeth off her feet in the end and that’s the quintessential romantic hero move.  I hope I would not have chosen either James or Neil and recognized I needed time to grow in my own way.

These are my thoughts on the book. Now that you know where I stand, I hope you’ll share your opinions.  I enjoyed the book, even though some aspects seemed a little underdeveloped or delivered too quickly. I would recommend it to my fellow Jane-ites out there. If you have read a book related to Jane Austen’s memorable characters and novels that you would recommend, please share in the comments below!

The Case of the Nervous Accomplice by Erle Stanley Gardner

Review by Matt B. (BuffaloSavage)

 
Mrs. Sybil Harlan asks Perry Mason to help her spoil a real estate deal and thus win back her wandering husband Enright a.k.a Enny. Her vision has Perry buying stock in a real-estate investment company and making a nuisance of himself at a director’s meeting.

This disruption of a big deal will bring out the worst in her hubby’s GF, the tempting redhead Roxy Claffin. Once Enny sees Roxy in her acquisitive glory, he will fly back to the loving arms of his wife to celebrate their upcoming fifth anniversary. On the adulterous liaison, her advice, I think would make a daring date question: “Agree or disagree ‘A woman should never forgive a man for infidelities. She should remain in complete ignorance.’”

Unfortunately a bad guy gets wind of her hiring Mason. A murder takes place. The killing of crabby millionaire George C. “Daddy” Lutts in a deserted house on company land overshadows the domestic drama and lands Sybil in the dock accused of murder.

The time to read a whodunit is whenever a reader wants to escape drudgery but still wants the comfort of familiar elements. Perry’s client lies to him in order to motivate him to work harder. Perry makes a witness look silly on the stand. Perry courts disbarment proceedings. Perry’s antagonist DA Burger gets a come-uppance. Della personifies devotion, Paul a Doubting Thomas.

Different yet the same: fine, if that’s what’s we need on a rainy Saturday afternoon….

An Oxford Tragedy by J.C. Masterman

Review by Matt B. (BuffaloSavage)

This 1933 novel feels authentic because its author was an academic all his life. Like the historian author, the narrator Francis Wheatley Winn is the Senior Tutor in History at fictional St. Thomas’s. He probably speaks for the author when he avers “My life is bound up in the life of the college.” Familiar elements of the classic mystery are a large number of suspects, an amateur detective, and a lengthy anti-climactic discussion of the puzzle in the last 25 pages.  In A Catalogue Of Crime (1989), critics Barzun and Taylor list it as one of the 90 best mysteries and say of it, “A first rate story, which…projects the genuine atmosphere, establishes plausible characters, and furnishes detection, logic and discussion of ‘method’ in admirably simple and attractive English…a masterpiece.”

I’m not sure I’d go that far. But I heartily recommend it to readers that like classic mysteries set at Oxford-type universities. It’s rather more intellectual than Gaudy Night by Dorothy L. Sayers, with sometimes stiff vocabulary and ruminations on how a quiet community of scholars is rattled by a killing. It is, however, less flippant than Michael Innes’ The Weight of the Evidence in which while sunning himself in a courtyard Professor Pluckrose is crushed to death by a meteorite that the culprit has shoved out a window. At least, in this novel, one has a sense that murder has been done and that violence has dark consequences nobody can guess.